AERRIS vs Harvey
Broad legal AI. Focused transaction intelligence.
Harvey supports many kinds of legal work across a practice.
AERRIS provides visual, configurable contract intelligence for complex legal and transaction work — structured around the matter, project or operating context rather than the individual prompt.
Side by side
Harvey
AERRIS
- Best for
Harvey
Legal work across research, drafting, review and workflows.
AERRIS
Transaction legal due diligence and contract intelligence.
- Starting point
Harvey
A legal task, question or document set.
AERRIS
A configured matter: scope, thresholds, risk appetite, parties.
- How context is handled
Harvey
Supplied by the team through instructions and knowledge.
AERRIS
Modelled once for the matter, then applied consistently.
- Primary output
Harvey
Task, chat and document-centred legal work product.
AERRIS
A transaction view that drills to the originating clause.
- Best fit
Harvey
Teams standardising broad legal AI across the practice.
AERRIS
Teams that need the contract dataset to behave like a deal model.
Which fits?
Choose Harvey when…
- Breadth across many practice areas is the priority.
- Research, drafting and workflows matter as much as diligence.
- One general legal platform is the goal.
Choose AERRIS when…
- The dataset must be understood as a transaction.
- Materiality is configured per matter, not restated per reviewer.
- Partners and clients need one decision view, traceable to source.
The products are not necessarily mutually exclusive — the right choice depends on the work you need the platform to own.
See AERRIS on a real matter.
Run a representative transaction through AERRIS and judge the resulting view for yourself.