AERRIS vs traditional diligence
Six artefacts, or one connected transaction view.
The traditional process is familiar, flexible and well understood by every team.
AERRIS holds the same evidence once, current and source-linked, in one workspace.
Side by side
Traditional diligence
AERRIS
- Best for
Traditional diligence
Familiar data-room, Word, Excel, email and manual reporting.
AERRIS
One workspace where the legal position stays connected.
- Starting point
Traditional diligence
A data room and a checklist per workstream.
AERRIS
A configured matter shared by every role.
- How context is handled
Traditional diligence
Reassembled by hand at each handover.
AERRIS
Held once and viewed by role.
- Primary output
Traditional diligence
Separate memos, trackers and report versions.
AERRIS
A single current view that drills to source.
- Best fit
Traditional diligence
Small matters where manual assembly is manageable.
AERRIS
Matters where visibility and currency matter throughout.
Which fits?
Choose the traditional process when…
- The document set is small and short-lived.
- No structured reporting is required.
- Existing habits are sufficient for the matter.
Choose AERRIS when…
- Status must be visible before the report is written.
- Findings must stay current as documents arrive.
- Every statement must trace back to a clause.
The products are not necessarily mutually exclusive — the right choice depends on the work you need the platform to own.
Other comparisons
See AERRIS on a real matter.
Run a representative transaction through AERRIS and judge the resulting view for yourself.